|
Australian Apple devotees may not have to wait until next year to get their hands on the iPhone, as its user interface (UI) can be downloaded onto competing devices that are available now.
Savvy coders have developed iPhone "skins" that work with most smartphones based on the Windows Mobile and Palm operating systems.
The issue has angered Apple to such an extent that it has sent its lawyers after a number of those involved - both directly and indirectly.
The skins don't add any new functionality to the devices, but make use of the iPhone's copyrighted icons to create a UI that distinctly resembles Apple's hybrid mobile phone.
Soon after the skins were uploaded to the Brighthand and Xda-developers internet message boards, Apple unleashed its legal team, who sent removal letters to at least one of the websites hosting the files.
Apple's lawyers also sent letters to journalists who simply reported on the fact that the skins were available.
"It has come to our attention that you have posted a screenshot of Apple's new iPhone and links that facilitate the installation of that screenshot on a PocketPC device," law firm O'Melveny & Myers LLP wrote to Paul O'Brien, who runs the MoDaCo website.
"While we appreciate your interest in the iPhone, the icons and screenshot displayed on your website are copyrighted by Apple.
"Apple therefore demands that you remove this screenshot from your website and refrain from facilitating the further dissemination of Apple's copyrighted material by removing the link to
http://forum.xda-developers.com, where said icons and screenshot are being distributed."
Apple's actions have sparked fury among tech industry watchers, who have accused the company of bullying and being notoriously litigious.
"I think this is all complete nonsense," Michael Arrington, of the influential technology blog TechCrunch, said.
"If Apple wants to go after the guy that made the Windows Mobile skin that looks like the iPhone, fine. But to bully bloggers who are simply reporting on this is another matter."
Ironically, Apple's attempts to have the files removed from the web have only given the skins greater publicity, and they have already begun spreading to other websites.
The issue marks a distinct change in tone for many bloggers and journalists, who just last week praised Apple for its "revolutionary" and "game-changing" phone despite being unable to conduct a proper hands-on test of the product. Savvy coders have developed iPhone "skins" that work with most smartphones based on the Windows Mobile and Palm operating systems.
The issue has angered Apple to such an extent that it has sent its lawyers after a number of those involved - both directly and indirectly.
The skins don't add any new functionality to the devices, but make use of the iPhone's copyrighted icons to create a UI that distinctly resembles Apple's hybrid mobile phone.
Soon after the skins were uploaded to the Brighthand and Xda-developers internet message boards, Apple unleashed its legal team, who sent removal letters to at least one of the websites hosting the files.
Apple's lawyers also sent letters to journalists who simply reported on the fact that the skins were available.
"It has come to our attention that you have posted a screenshot of Apple's new iPhone and links that facilitate the installation of that screenshot on a PocketPC device," law firm O'Melveny & Myers LLP wrote to Paul O'Brien, who runs the MoDaCo website.
"While we appreciate your interest in the iPhone, the icons and screenshot displayed on your website are copyrighted by Apple.
"Apple therefore demands that you remove this screenshot from your website and refrain from facilitating the further dissemination of Apple's copyrighted material by removing the link to
http://forum.xda-developers.com, where said icons and screenshot are being distributed."
Apple's actions have sparked fury among tech industry watchers, who have accused the company of bullying and being notoriously litigious.
"I think this is all complete nonsense," Michael Arrington, of the influential technology blog TechCrunch, said.
"If Apple wants to go after the guy that made the Windows Mobile skin that looks like the iPhone, fine. But to bully bloggers who are simply reporting on this is another matter."
Ironically, Apple's attempts to have the files removed from the web have only given the skins greater publicity, and they have already begun spreading to other websites.
The issue marks a distinct change in tone for many bloggers and journalists, who just last week praised Apple for its "revolutionary" and "game-changing" phone despite being unable to conduct a proper hands-on test of the product.
But this isn't the first example of Apple's legal team targeting individual bloggers and website owners.
In a high-profile US lawsuit that was filed in late 2004, Apple sued three bloggers after they published information - which Apple labelled "trade secrets" - of an unreleased Apple product.
By filing the suit, Apple hoped to determine who in the company was leaking information to the media.
The court initially ruled in favour of Apple, but the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the organisation representing the bloggers, lodged an appeal.
Judge Franklin Elia of the 6th District Court of Appeal rejected Apple's arguments that the bloggers were not true "journalists" protected by First Amendment rights to keep their sources secret.
"All you want here is the name of a snitch, so you're saying you have the right to invade the privacy of the email system and to trump the First Amendment ... just to find out who in your organisation is giving out inappropriate information?" Judge Elia asked Apple's attorney.
Apple later dropped the case, deciding against taking it to the Supreme Court.
An Apple spokesman declined to comment for this story.
|
iPhone Australia, iPhone hacks , iPhone news
Home
| 
Advertise with us
| 
Links
| 
iPhone Accessories (Soon)
| 
Sign Up | 
Glossary | 
Contact Us 
iPhone skins irk Apple
File Attachments
User Comments 
Related Questions
Search Knowledge Base